Built for founders and agency teams who need faster operations without losing visibility.
Most automation gets deployed without governance. Emails go out from workflows nobody can audit. Approvals happen in Slack threads with no record. Systems work until they stop, with no clear path back.
Every workflow we build starts draft-first. External actions are approval-gated. Every run has an audit trail. Built inside your existing stack, owned by your team from day one.
Choose the engagement that matches where you are right now.
Operations Review
from £497
Audit + ranked backlog
Build Sprint
from £2,500
3 governed workflows
Oversight & Optimisation
from £750/mo
Monthly reliability
Works inside your existing stack
Most builds fall into one of these tracks. Your audit selects the exact workflows based on bottlenecks, ROI, and risk.
Best for: founders drowning in follow-ups and admin.
Best for: client teams needing consistent delivery and comms.
Best for: outbound and pipeline hygiene without auto-send.
| Time | Step | Owner | Evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09:14 | S-01 Trigger received | Ops | Request page link |
| 09:18 | S-02 Draft created | Operaitions | Draft doc |
| 09:29 | S-03 Approval | Client owner | Approval note |
| 09:33 | S-04 Executed update | Operaitions | Change log |
| 09:34 | S-05 Exception check | Operaitions | 0 issues |
External sends are blocked until the owner approves. Reason and evidence are recorded.
No. External actions stay approval-gated by default. We start draft-first and only delegate further when confidence is established.
Typically Notion, Google Workspace, Slack, and CRMs. We build inside your existing stack — no rip and replace.
Approvals, ownership, exception handling, and a clear audit trail with evidence links. Every workflow ships with a controls pack so your team can see exactly what ran and who signed off.
You receive runbooks and controls documentation so your team can run and update workflows without needing us. Ongoing oversight is available for reliability and optimisation — but it is an option, not a requirement.
That is the usual starting point. The Operations Review maps what you actually do, not what you think you do. Most clients have more automatable patterns than they realise once we look at a typical week together.
Typically the issue is that something ran without oversight. Every workflow we build starts in draft mode and nothing external executes until a named owner approves it. Speed without the risk of something going out wrong.
No. Every workflow ships with a runbook. Your team can operate, edit, and update without needing us. Ongoing oversight is an option, not a requirement.
Every workflow has an exception path built in: a defined pause-and-escalate process so nothing silently fails. If you are on the Oversight plan we monitor and fix it. If not, the runbook tells your team exactly what to do.
You can. But building it yourself means no approval gates, no audit trail, no exception handling, and no runbooks. It also means your time. We handle the build and the governance layer you would never get around to adding yourself.
